Search results

you killed the vibe =(

I believe this was a good place to reminisce. Memories are useless if you can't express them with each other.

Have you seen the restorations on the 3/4 dodges? Modded with the charger engines. What a king of a truck man. I'm not gonna lie, getting my Ranger felt good. I didn't feel like I was dragging my feet to buy something. Still keeping the memories, but it wasn't like having to sell the dream cars...

And there is many other things to have fun with, too. Never know, maybe another SVO falls in your lap for a good price, too.

got me some DIY info for the side vent LEDs?

installed aerothingy for the bonnet.

Man, was reminiscing about some old times. I used to own a GTR and a sunny ute. Having the GTR was a blast. Met my wife when I had it. She'd never admit it, but I'm sure rollin' up in it had something to do with the marriage. I sold it for a huge chunk of change. It furnished our entire life...

Not completely accurate. My GTR would knock going up to Niigata, but not coming down, and would knock going up to Hakkoda, but not coming down. My ECU would auto-cal once I hit certain IAT, to automatically reduce timing. Back then I was dumb and would use 95 RON. I eventually changed to 105 RON...

Guys, but imagine... $2.79 ...ethanol free... 93 octane. :please::please::please::please:

There is a major difference between design and nominal. as quoted from the manufacturers manual: “ for best overall vehicle performance, premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended. The performance gained using premium fuel is most noticeable in HOT WEATHER as well as...

He's a well loved idiot.

Little bit of bro-science, mixed with AI and JDM guess-formation. Could be interesting. - Ethanol-free does provide a better MPG - 87 octane is equivalent 89 octane @ 4500 ft. - Non-ethanol octane booster (consider $0, increases octane by 3-4 points) Comes out to $4.00 for 92-93 octane range...

Does octane rating at altitude have a negative affect? —> higher altitude, use lower octane? —> lower altitude, use higher octane?

See that's the math I've been tracking. I've done a 1k mile test. Seems that 91 provides an MPG increase that can't be ignored. Difficult line to draw. Ethanol free with booster, no booster, or straight 91 and pay the price....

I'm petty about fuel and oil. I like to min/max everything for no reason. Gas prices are very high right now. I'm seeing $4.89 for 91 octane. Pretty horrendous. So I decided to swap over to ethanol-free 87 octane. With that ethanol-free 87 octane, I think it would be dumb for me to mix it...

Seems we need to standby for LRA or another company to provide the larger tanks. It would be nice to know why Ford wouldn't have an extended fuel tank option. Australia and the United States are about the same size. Both our countries have a huge off-road and long range enthusiast cohort.

I've not seen someone perform the modification on a US spec XLT 4x4 with 2.7L yet.

This is US spec. Are those tanks compatible with US spec?