Sponsored

Search results

  1. is the 2.3L enough or should you opt for the 2.7:??? I fear the cam phaser issues on the 2.7!!!!!

    My fault for not explaining this correctly. It has a wet oil pump drive belt. Same song different verse.

  2. is the 2.3L enough or should you opt for the 2.7:??? I fear the cam phaser issues on the 2.7!!!!!

    Just do a google search

  3. is the 2.3L enough or should you opt for the 2.7:??? I fear the cam phaser issues on the 2.7!!!!!

    I worked for Ford for several years. From what I understand, it was strictly a cost measure. Most folks don’t keep their vehicles over 100,000 miles. As long as they don’t blow up under warranty, the manufacturer doesn’t care. Anyone who thinks that it’s ok to use a rubber belt in a high torque...

  4. Help with tire selection

    Will the 255/75/17 fit without rubbing??

  5. is the 2.3L enough or should you opt for the 2.7:??? I fear the cam phaser issues on the 2.7!!!!!

    2.7L has a wet timing belt. Stay away from that design, unless you're looking forward to your engine killing itself from inside.

  6. Mileage on your truck at delivery?

    Mine had a whopping 5 Miles on it when they unloaded it off the truck

  7. 2024 Ranger STX better Highway mileage in “normal” mode than “Eco”

    The XL doesn’t have the 4a option. Just 2h, 4h & 4l. I thought the eco mode was more geared toward city driving, just wasn’t sure. ?

  8. 2024 Ranger STX better Highway mileage in “normal” mode than “Eco”

    New poster here, Recently, I’ve noticed that my new truck gets better mileage (highway) in normal mode than in eco. I live in rural Pennsylvania, so most of my driving is highway. On a 200 mile trip (100 each direction) the ranger got 24mpg in eco, and 26.5 in normal. Is eco mode geared to get...
View older results



Top