Search results

I actually prefer the ranger interior to the taco. For some reason it just doesn't do it for me.

That is my bad, I was thinking the AC outlet and not the 12V when I first read the question. I bet they are rated the same.

That is interesting. The NA is 400W, but no documentation on the amps. I would imagine it is similar though.

Maybe they dropped info they shouldn't have. Ford is on this forum.

Looks like my Truck is on Ramp 1 and slated for RAIL transport according to the updated sticker. I wonder if that means they are moving soon.

They haven't shipped any yet. It will be closer to March most likely.

It is an auto email, which is why it was sent.

I am pretty sure anyone with a "delivery date" is just a date pre-populated by the system based on the completed build date that we cannot see in the trackers yet. It sounds like they are holding the trucks until QC is complete. As a side note, I haven't seen anyone mention they had a check...

They don't schedule to the day. They only schedule to a certain week.

It isn't a copy paste from the international rangers. The NA has quite a few changes...it also required new tooling on the old ranger assembly lines. This has been brought up before. Also, just because it was revealed almost a year ago doesn't mean much. The timer starts from when they were...

https://www.motorcraftservice.com/AsBuilt You just need your VIN #

As was said above it takes just a few days to build them start to finish. I can also see all of my trucks active modules on the motorcraft website that has been mentioned in other forms. It has also been assigned a tear tag number (motorcraft website) which according to bronco forms means it is...

It is hard to estimate right now because trucks are built but not being put to a built status currently (They are being held for QA checks). Once Ford actually starts shipping them out and things flow properly you can estimate things. My truck has been built since about 1/19, but still shows...

Interesting! The towing guide/builders guides made it look like the 2.7l was 4x4 only, granted those 2 things were pretty old, and it was discussed many months ago.

The only thing indicated differently with the 2.7l is that it is only available with 4x4.

It was 91 octane which is also what the 2.7l requires/is rated with from the factory

I assume they meant 30k in the bank as a down payment when they pick it up

There are so many 2.3l ecoboosts that if it were a widespread issue I would have expected to see more by now. I don't think carbon build up is actually that bad.

It is easier to just ignore. The way they post is pretty telling of the maturity level. They didn't change much even after having posts removed.

Ford performance offers tunes under warranty https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-9603-REB and there are various other aftermarket ones. It is also worth noting the one I linked does require 91 octane, but the 2.7l power and mpg ratings are on 91 octane from the factory. The 2.3l from the...