Search results

You read my mind. That and have a higher MPG option.... otherwise it is already out for me. I am currently watching the Ranger and Tacoma and specifically wanting more rear legroom and a hybrid option.... it it doesn't pan out then I'm going with Maverick

Bummer. Thanks for the info!

Looks pretty good to me. I really like the interior... way nicer than the Ranger IMO. Curios to hear MPG since they are doing away with diesel because 'similar' numbers with new engines. Do we think they can do 20/28? And of course would like to know the rear sear room. Wheelbase 3 inches...

It's interesting that you mention this because the maverick although has a smaller area for payload it actually rivals half ton's etc, and in some cases beats them. I'm not familiar with Australian specs but I am going by my area. You might find this video interesting. But again, it is...

Right and I'm not buying to tow things, if someone is towing on a regular basis then the Maverick is not the vehicle for them. What "truck" things specifically is less capable other than towing? 90% of trucks in the states are not going off road. If you regularly go off road I am unsure why you...

Oh yeah, if you are going to tow something on a regular basis than I wouldn't go with the maverick

Me as well. If US spec is no different, I don't see why I would buy this over a Maverick....for me personally

A midsize hybrid is at the top of my list..... who ever has one out next year will likely be my next vehicle.

Yeah, I was able to sit in one at a recent auto show and liked it a lot. I would rather a truck for my next vehicle, but it that doesn't work out the Sienna is at the top of the list, I think I would rather have that than another small CUV

For sure after the GM twins, or at least the Colorado. My guess is 2023 Super duty in August, and 2023 Ranger in November

Ha ha, yeah I am odd, I've always thought minivans were cool, now in our 40's and never had any kids the wife is still like 'no way!' to a minivan but I think it would be great. The practicality of them has always made me like them. I'm not looking for anything fast, just enough to merge and...

Yep, the Maverick has more legroom than the current Ranger as well. Personally I have been in all the midsizers and that has been the thing that has stopped me from buying one. I regularly (pre COVID) had people in my back seat so it kills me that the small suv's have more legroom than the...

Do you have any links to confirm this or just a guess? Doesn't seem smart for Ford to give the next gen ranger less rear legroom than the maverick

Yes that is correct, it's a 6.5', sorry I wasn't being more specific as I generally call them 5 or 6 foot beds. I knew others offered this but was thinking they were just the longer bed and not an extended wheelbase, but I did look and see that was incorrect. But yeah again it is a very small...

I have tried in the past but have not found any which is strange indeed.

The cost is better for a second frame? If there is a larger cab it will be a US only thing (has to be different more than the bumper right) and the bed itself will be the variable. My guess is we will find out for sure in a few months

Yeah initially the story on autoblog said 'long cab' and it did look longer, but then comparing pictures it isn't as obvious. Only time will tell for sure, but my hope is the US cab is larger and we are just seeing it for the first time on a long bed version. My guess is this will be the...

Personally, I am fine with the shorter 5' bed, but the longer cab is a must for me.... that's why I don't currently have a midsize truck, not enough room in that back seat for any adults unless the driver is short.

So does the cab look larger as well? back door looks big, which I hope so because I would love at least 38" of rear legroom

Any idea of the interior dimensions? I have not been able to find and I'm curious if the rear seat legroom got any better.