BigOleOgre
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Preface and Build Theory: I've always loved modifying my vehicles for higher higher hp/tq. Obviously this equals-mo power, mo fun, mo money. While waiting for other things to fall into place, or not, for the tuning end I've been doing some research. I played around with the idea of custom installing TD04 19T turbos (for those who don't know this is probably one of the best little turbos ever made), but was getting quite involved and expensive to even consider, then Garrett announced the powermax turbo upgrades for the 3.0 and 2.7, more on that later.
Insights: The 3.0 and 2.7 turbos are similar enough to be interchangeable (i know the turbines, exhaust out, and air inlet/outlets are different, stay with me)
The ecoboost turbos exhaust inlets (manifold connection) are identical in terms of bolt pattern and size, which means they are a direct fit and interchangeable in that regard. The turbo exhaust outlet (downpipe connection) really doesn't matter as you can now connect Raptor 3.0 downpipes. The Air inlet and outlets are slightly smaller on the 2.7 vs 3.0, but now all those larger piping add-ons can be utilized. Therefore all the Raptor turbo feed bolt ons (3.0 intakes and piping, intercooler piping, downpipes etc) can now be used, with some minor alterations if needed, on the 2.7. With the very limited support the 2.7 ranger is getting in these regards i find this a revelation. Why should those weird Raptor kids get all the fun right? With Turbos MO AIR=MO POWA.
Plan: The new Garrett Powermax turbos for the 2.7 and 3.0 are the EXACT same Turbo, the only difference being the Air inlet/outlet size.
If im spending $3500 on turbos, around $6-7k with supporting mods...why wouldn't i just opt for the Turbos that allow for larger air-intake/charge and exhaust-downpipe connections? So i can now utilize the large pipe process west crossover intake, intercooler charge pipes, stage 2 intercooler, and a set of Raptor downpipes with a larger exhaust to fully utilize the airflow of the new turbos.
Conclusion: With all the smaller air and exhaust systems changed to the larger and better cooling systems available to the 3.0 Raptor the 2.7 is now perched to make the same power, all things being equal, minus the displacement.
This is my plan, done some looking, but this is an open theory, if I've missed something please come crush my hopes and dreams so i can evaluate and reassess. But I'm excited for the potential of 500+ safe wheel hp and tq. I would love to be that guinea pig that goes E85 for max power, but i drive all over the place and can only reliably get 93. However, i will be the guinea pig for longevity at this power level as i put on 20-30k miles a year covering my midwest territory. The CGI nano engine is very stout and i don't doubt it can handle it, after looking into other platforms 2.7 builds that have reached these numbers. My final piece will be tune, which hopefully is The Gander. but in the mean time fun money is accruing. Worst case scenario is i just go with the 2.7 powermaxes, and wait for more 2.7 support.
Stock Turbos modified by CRP. L 2.7, R 3.0
Garrett Powermax Turbos L 2.7, R 3.0
Project West Large Pipe intake and charge pipes
Insights: The 3.0 and 2.7 turbos are similar enough to be interchangeable (i know the turbines, exhaust out, and air inlet/outlets are different, stay with me)
The ecoboost turbos exhaust inlets (manifold connection) are identical in terms of bolt pattern and size, which means they are a direct fit and interchangeable in that regard. The turbo exhaust outlet (downpipe connection) really doesn't matter as you can now connect Raptor 3.0 downpipes. The Air inlet and outlets are slightly smaller on the 2.7 vs 3.0, but now all those larger piping add-ons can be utilized. Therefore all the Raptor turbo feed bolt ons (3.0 intakes and piping, intercooler piping, downpipes etc) can now be used, with some minor alterations if needed, on the 2.7. With the very limited support the 2.7 ranger is getting in these regards i find this a revelation. Why should those weird Raptor kids get all the fun right? With Turbos MO AIR=MO POWA.
Plan: The new Garrett Powermax turbos for the 2.7 and 3.0 are the EXACT same Turbo, the only difference being the Air inlet/outlet size.
If im spending $3500 on turbos, around $6-7k with supporting mods...why wouldn't i just opt for the Turbos that allow for larger air-intake/charge and exhaust-downpipe connections? So i can now utilize the large pipe process west crossover intake, intercooler charge pipes, stage 2 intercooler, and a set of Raptor downpipes with a larger exhaust to fully utilize the airflow of the new turbos.
Conclusion: With all the smaller air and exhaust systems changed to the larger and better cooling systems available to the 3.0 Raptor the 2.7 is now perched to make the same power, all things being equal, minus the displacement.
This is my plan, done some looking, but this is an open theory, if I've missed something please come crush my hopes and dreams so i can evaluate and reassess. But I'm excited for the potential of 500+ safe wheel hp and tq. I would love to be that guinea pig that goes E85 for max power, but i drive all over the place and can only reliably get 93. However, i will be the guinea pig for longevity at this power level as i put on 20-30k miles a year covering my midwest territory. The CGI nano engine is very stout and i don't doubt it can handle it, after looking into other platforms 2.7 builds that have reached these numbers. My final piece will be tune, which hopefully is The Gander. but in the mean time fun money is accruing. Worst case scenario is i just go with the 2.7 powermaxes, and wait for more 2.7 support.
Stock Turbos modified by CRP. L 2.7, R 3.0
Garrett Powermax Turbos L 2.7, R 3.0
Project West Large Pipe intake and charge pipes
Sponsored
Last edited:
Now if it was my 3.5L Ecoboost F150. That's another story.