nice I ran 13.40 in the 1/4 mile with similar mods![]()
Very First Draggy Run w/ the setup in the description. Brake boosted to 3K in 4high on launch.
I wanted to see what it would do with the Procal & run it for a while then I will probably go with a ZFG custom tune in 2025nice I ran 13.40 in the 1/4 mile with similar mods
I will post there when I get some runs In tonight was my first run 0-60 was 4.85 spun a little & forgot to turn off traction control ? 2nd run a popped a intercooler hose clamp one I over tightened & forgot to replace so had to limp home ?https://www.ranger6g.com/forum/thre...tor-0-60-mph-verified-times-post-yours.13674/
this is the dragy thread I made best run is 4.59 0-60 post all dragy times here.
would love to see more times posted from you guys.
I may do the same, keep us up on your opinion of the Zfgr tuneI wanted to see what it would do with the Procal & run it for a while then I will probably go with a ZFG custom tune in 2025
Well damn that sucks you popped a hose clamp, i went out this morning and made some more runs to see if i could get any faster and no such luck so far. I went and test drove a hellcat Durango yest and the way im feeling right now i might have to trade im pretty much let down with the ranger all around. Aftermarket mods and stock explorer ST with the same motor can run as quick or quicker with better mpg. I havent seen a plus side to the RR yet its small and lighter weight yet gets crappy mpg has no back seat room for traveling really isn’t quick with a tune and intercooler. Wait i guess i can say i can run to Lowes and throw crap in the bedI will post there when I get some runs In tonight was my first run 0-60 was 4.85 spun a little & forgot to turn off traction control ? 2nd run a popped a intercooler hose clamp one I over tightened & forgot to replace so had to limp home ?
Are you comparing the RR to an ST or to a TRX? Because either way, those are very different vehicles to the RR that serve a very different purpose and should not be expected to have identical performance numbersWell damn that sucks you popped a hose clamp, i went out this morning and made some more runs to see if i could get any faster and no such luck so far. I went and test drove a hellcat Durango yest and the way im feeling right now i might have to trade im pretty much let down with the ranger all around. Aftermarket mods and stock explorer ST with the same motor can run as quick or quicker with better mpg. I havent seen a plus side to the RR yet its small and lighter weight yet gets crappy mpg has no back seat room for traveling really isn’t quick with a tune and intercooler. Wait i guess i can say i can run to Lowes and throw crap in the bed
I know there is a 13.10. 12 99 in this truck with these modsGot a quick run in tonight but it was cold a foggy so spun a little on launch ?![]()
Yes in an apples to oranges round about way. But i whole expect the RR to be fairly equal to the ST these trucks are fairly light got a lot more gearing and have the same engine platform. Now the TRX hell no Im just sayin i miss mine compared to the RR.Are you comparing the RR to an ST or to a TRX? Because either way, those are very different vehicles to the RR that serve a very different purpose and should not be expected to have identical performance numbers
Ya it’s was damp from the fog so traction was a issue spun in 1st so launched in second on this one still spun if I can get a better 60ft I think I can get in the higher 12’sI know there is a 13.10. 12 99 in this truck with these mods