some_guy
Well-Known Member
The 2.3t is in the Mustang and Explorer. No engine is exclusive to the Ranger line.If only the F150 was the determining factor, we would have never had the 2.3 in the Ranger.
Sponsored
The 2.3t is in the Mustang and Explorer. No engine is exclusive to the Ranger line.If only the F150 was the determining factor, we would have never had the 2.3 in the Ranger.
Crew cab with a manual back window means you’ll never see them open. The relatively few trucks with power sliding rear windows actually make sense and are useful, but still subject to opinions. I personally use mine all the time, because I can. Easily.I knew there would be people that say the opposite. No doubt some people will use and enjoy stuff in a different way from me. But... I still RARELY see them open on ANY truck. Doesn't mean I don't see them used; just not much.
Seems like solid glass should be available across all trim levels. That's all I'm saying.
I’ve always had one manual at least and they come in handy for long things.Crew cab with a manual back window means you’ll never see them open. The relatively few trucks with power sliding rear windows actually make sense and are useful, but still subject to opinions. I personally use mine all the time, because I can. Easily.
The fake stuff is overall better. Stays cooler in the summer, less freezing in the winter, more durable and less prone to cracks or tears. Doesn't stain as easily, and can be cleaned easier.Very curious why these companies are dropping leather even on the most premium trims?
the video shows a page with print saying door Insets but I think you are rightI'll have to check the door. I don't think it has any leather.
From what I can tell, the only leather in my Lariat is the center panels in the bottom and back of the front seats and this doesn't include the side bolsters. For all practical purposes I wouldn't say the seats are leather and Ford is misleading people in their advertising. I agree with @NOT_RAPTOR in that the ActiveX material is likely as good, or even better, than leather for the reasons mentioned. Also, I would prefer the areas where the driver contacts the seats to be all leather or all ActiveX material. IMO, having a mix of materials makes the seats slightly less comfortable due to the leather being less pliable than the ActiveX fabric.the video shows a page with print saying door Insets but I think you are right
i think it is soft touch with leather stitching, door arm rests, window Sill front doors, top glove box, and top of instrument console.
so not leather but leather stitching. I’m not sure if the stitching is leather or if it is just stitching to make it look more like leather.
Meh.The fake stuff is overall better. Stays cooler in the summer, less freezing in the winter, more durable and less prone to cracks or tears. Doesn't stain as easily, and can be cleaned easier.
There's a lot of design and tech that goes into that stuff.
OK but its easier to clean, more durable, lasts longer with less issues. Go ahead and find the magical material that does it all and you'll be rich as hell.Fake stuff does not breathe as well as real leather.
Myself, and the internet, would disagree with you. Simply ask google or your favorite AI and see what it says.OK but its easier to clean, more durable, lasts longer with less issues. Go ahead and find the magical material that does it all and you'll be rich as hell.
I'd also not agree with you, I find fake stuff to breathe very well and be very comfortable sitting in for long periods. I think real leather is what gets hot and clammy and the fake stuff stays more comfortable. My experience with the fake stuff has been from Mercedes and BMW mostly.
I think the only place the good quality fake stuff falls apart is the PR department - some old folks are never going to be convinced anything can be better than leather and there's absolutely nothing a better made material can do to convince them otherwise.