ChronciallyChronic
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2025
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 341
- Reaction score
- 511
- Location
- Central Florida
- Vehicle(s)
- 2024 Ford Ranger Lariat
The 2.3L engine runs off a timing chain but is GDI without any valve injection to keep things clean. I chose to go with the 2.3L because of the chain knowing I will need valve cleaning service. As far as MPG's I'm routinely pulling between 27-29 mpg highway, 24mpg mixed city/highway driving, I'm pretty sure the 2.7L can't match. Hope that fills in some of the blanks I left.That didn't quite answer the question. Your opinion seems logical regarding the belt vs chain question. But why does that logic apply to the 2.7 vs the 2.3?
Again, assuming your opinion reflects Ford's, is the 2.3 a more highly stressed engine relative to the 2.7 and therefore has less margin for error? Or is the 2.3 motor fuel efficient to the degree that a wet oil pump belt offers even less marginal mpg improvement vs chain?
I understand these are your opinions, but I find the difference in approach between the two engines curios.
Sponsored