Sponsored

F-150 Approach, Breakover and Departure (stock) vs. Ranger Raptor

Lion77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2025
Threads
32
Messages
880
Reaction score
1,283
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger Raptor
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
I see a lot of people claim the RR stock needs this or that and really kind paint it as a not so great and desperately in need of bigger tires and a lift to do any serious off-roading (trails etc.). There is no doubt that if you want to optimize the RR for wheelin', those can offer some significant enhancement to an otherwise already capable truck.

But how does it stack up to the gold standard of "Raptor", the F-150? Just some food for thought on how versatile the RR really is even stock, especially at its price point:

Cranking Up the O.G. Desert Predator: Ford Unleashes Most Off-Road Capable and Connected F-150 Raptor Ever | Canada | English | Ford Media Center

"Wearing 35-inch tires, Raptor clears 12-inch obstacles with an approach angle of 31 degrees, maximum departure angle of 23.9 degrees and breakover angle of 22.7 degrees. Raptor with 37-inch tires features 13.1 inches of running clearance, 33.1 degrees of approach angle, a maximum 24.9 degrees of departure angle and 24.4 degrees of breakover angle."

F-150 on stock 35's:
Approach 31 degrees
Breakover 22.7 degrees
Departure 23.9 degrees

RR on stock 33's
Approach 33 degrees
Breakover is 24.2 degrees
Departure 26.4 degrees

If you upgrade the F-150 to factory 37's they offer (quite expensive), then they match up much more closely in approach, departure and break-over. The F-150 is a big, long truck, so it needs a lot more ground clearance to make those angles workable!

I think a pair of angled rock sliders and a high clearance front bumper would do wonders for the stock RR's wheelin' capability without even touching the suspension or tire size. A 1" lift in the front would help with approach (guessing 1-2 degrees of additional approach) while not eliminating the critical rake for on-throttle handling when the rear squats for higher speed stuff, assuming the bed is not loaded, but if you plan to load the bed and still handle some squat, the higher factory rake is better.

I'm thinking a high clearance bumper with a 1" front lift would get you into the high 30's for approach even on stock tires and that's kinda my take on balancing 4x4 capability while maintaining its rally nature. What would be really nice is to run 34's or 34.5's with a high clearance fender option, so you're not lifting the truck's suspension....one day I may embark on a custom fender project to see if it can be done!

With +35 off-set wheels, the 0.5 to 0.8in gain in ground clearance would help for wheelin' but have little effect on cornering due to the added stance off-setting the slight increase in CG from tires and it's "true ground clearance", not just lifting the chassis like strut spacers, which I think is the most useful overall.
Sponsored

 

stuartmunto

Well-Known Member
First Name
Stuart
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Threads
21
Messages
545
Reaction score
895
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Vehicle(s)
2023 Ford Ranger Raptor
Occupation
Engineer
I personally think it’s crazy to change the RR setup from stock. The RR is more than capable enough bone stock! All I’ve added is an air compressor and the thing just eats up everything I throw at it!

adding lifts or bigger tyres will only have a negative effect in my opinion. it’s a Baja truck after all, designed for high speed off-roading - if you want a hard core rock climber then you need to look elsewhere and buy the right vehicle for your uses
 

dpAtlanta

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Jan 30, 2026
Threads
9
Messages
126
Reaction score
306
Location
Just North of Atlanta
Vehicle(s)
2026 Ranger Raptor, '19 GT350, '24 Bronco Badlands 2Door, '17 718
Future RR owner here... this is impressive that the angles are similar to a F-150 Raptor on 37's.
I plan on using the RR as a daily driver, but I do plan on taking it to Windrock Park in Oliver Springs, TN.
Once I saw this, I checked the angles on my Bronco 2-door Sasquatch on OEM 35's:
Approach 43.2 degrees
Breakover 26.3 degrees
Departure 37.0 degrees
It's not a fair comparison since the 2-door is so short, but it has almost zero utility.... it's a fun toy for sure. The Bronco is kind of cheating when it comes to rock crawling trails.
I'm looking forward to trading in my 11-year-old full size Chevy truck for the RR.
 
Last edited:

E40

Well-Known Member
First Name
Andy
Joined
Nov 4, 2024
Threads
4
Messages
68
Reaction score
75
Location
ATL
Vehicle(s)
24 Ranger Raptor NE
Ranger Raptor lacks the ground clearance (10.7") compared to F150 Raptor despite higher breakover angle. In moderate level trails, my RR frequently drags its belly, side steps, rear trailing arm mounts.
I'm planning add 1.5" lift to front & rear with 35" tires. IMO this combo will give me the enough extra ground clearance to avoid 75-80% of scraping that I've experienced (obviously 600+ pounds of gears & equipments carried in the bed did not help either).
 
OP
OP
Lion77

Lion77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2025
Threads
32
Messages
880
Reaction score
1,283
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger Raptor
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Get rid of the 600lbs of gear and theres your 2" lift :LOL:.

Even +100lbs on the front can cost you almost an inch of clearance. Thats the think with performance suspension, its very weight sensitive unlike a leaf spring and traditional gas strut / coil over setup in the regular Rangers.

Sounds like you need stiffer springs more than the lift, but if you do any higher speed stuff I would recommend using limiting straps because rebound with stiffer springs can destroy the fox shocks as they are decompressing under much higher pressure than originally designed.

F-150 guys found that out the hard way!
Sponsored

 
 







Top