Roguescholar
Well-Known Member
I’ve seen a lot of head to head comparisons between Pennzoil Ultra Platinum and Amsoil. Amsoil is likely the better overall oil, as it tends to produce marginally less wear on engine components, particularly in high performance applications, due to its low NOACK volatility.I’m curious what the source of your assertion is? I just googled trying to find it and the tests I found actually came to the opposite conclusion. I’m not arguing one way or the other; just looking for your source.
That said, I think Pennzoil Ultra Platinum is better formulated specifically for direct injected engines due to its resistance to evaporative loss. With the 2.7L EcoBoost being direct injected (dual injection) and having a wet belt, I would be more concerned about sludge buildup and wet belt degradation (which is more of a chemical issue than a friction issue) than marginal differences in wear on piston rings, bearings, and other components.
If your particular use case exposes the engine to higher than normal wear, such as doing a lot of towing, then Amsoil would probably be the better choice. But for the average Ranger 2.7L owner, I think Pennzoil Ultra Platinum is the way to go.
However, changing your WSS-M2C961-A1 full synthetic oil every 3,000 to 5,000 miles is going to have a much bigger impact on the life of your wet belt then the specific brand of oil you run.
Sponsored