Sponsored

3.0L EB to be new base engine in '27 F-150

Texasota

Well-Known Member
First Name
Al
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Threads
1
Messages
397
Reaction score
314
Location
Rochester, MN
Vehicle(s)
2026 Ranger XLT, 2023 Escape PHEV
Based on what I see only about 15% are the 2.7L since 2024.
That makes sense. The 2.3 is a very capable engine in the Ranger. It does everything I need and tows my 4000 lb boat effortlessly. Impressive MPGs at the same time.

From a trusted insider on BOF:

The reason for the change was that the 2.7 wasn’t going to clear some emission compliance requirement of some sort. They’ve been working on this change since 2023.
 
Last edited:

Lion77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2025
Threads
34
Messages
999
Reaction score
1,467
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger Raptor
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
I wonder if they had to implement a similar feature like on the 3.5L where you get a self-cleaning cycle of the emissions system particulate filter that incurs parasitic power loss. The 3.5L went from ~400 HP to ~382 HP. Maybe moving to the 3.0L off sets that loss so you get the same power as the 2.7L but can also incorporate the emissions requirement.

To be fair, Toyota's 3.5L TT V6 makes about the same power at around 389 HP, with similar torque, guessing they already planned for the particulate filter or didn't need it to meet requirements.

New Toyota Tundra Engine: 2nd Gen Vs. 3rd Gen | Ira Toyota of Hyannis

2026 Ford F-150 Loses Horsepower Due To New Particulate Filter

I'll bet my bottom dollar that's the reason for the move to the 3.0L. Asinine emissions requirements made by some bureaucrat who doesn't know the difference between his elbow from his a**hole, completely oblivious of what they are asking and without any proof it has any meaningful impact on anything...except costing us money and reliability.
 

Phoenix5454

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2026
Threads
1
Messages
16
Reaction score
12
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2025 Ford Ranger XLT FX4 2.7TT
Occupation
BMET
I've been enjoying the 2.7 in my Ranger. Kind of sad to see it go in the F150 because I'm sure this is the beginning of all 2.7s just being some kind of 3.0 V6 anywhere you find a 2.7 now which I think is only the F150, Ranger and Bronco. Makes sense from a manufacturing cost sense but a Non Raptor Ranger with a detuned 3.0 V6 doesn't feel as "special" as having a 2.7 in a Ranger application... Thats just my opinion of course, and does seem like most non Raptor Rangers are sold with the 2.3 in NA. Im just hoping the non Raptor / ST versions of the 3.0 will feature port and direct injection as well as a full CGI block. We'll have to wait and see.
 

superj

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jason
Joined
Feb 8, 2025
Threads
42
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
3,517
Location
Corpus christi texas
Vehicle(s)
2024 ford ranger, 2019 wrangler, 2018 mazda3
Occupation
Retired
So this is how they will force Americans to get electric vehicles. Make fuel and def so expensive that 95% of the people won't be able to afford to drive
 

Sponsored

ryanO

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Sep 20, 2025
Threads
17
Messages
406
Reaction score
353
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2025 RangerXLT
Occupation
Sales
I wonder if they had to implement a similar feature like on the 3.5L where you get a self-cleaning cycle of the emissions system particulate filter that incurs parasitic power loss. The 3.5L went from ~400 HP to ~382 HP. Maybe moving to the 3.0L off sets that loss so you get the same power as the 2.7L but can also incorporate the emissions requirement.

To be fair, Toyota's 3.5L TT V6 makes about the same power at around 389 HP, with similar torque, guessing they already planned for the particulate filter or didn't need it to meet requirements.

New Toyota Tundra Engine: 2nd Gen Vs. 3rd Gen | Ira Toyota of Hyannis

2026 Ford F-150 Loses Horsepower Due To New Particulate Filter

I'll bet my bottom dollar that's the reason for the move to the 3.0L. Asinine emissions requirements made by some bureaucrat who doesn't know the difference between his elbow from his a**hole, completely oblivious of what they are asking and without any proof it has any meaningful impact on anything...except costing us money and reliability.
And yet the fools that live in your and my neighborhood vote for the politicians that push all th
So this is how they will force Americans to get electric vehicles. Make fuel and def so expensive that 95% of the people won't be able to afford to drive
Huh? I dont see that being the case. Fuel isnt even that expensive now.
 

Texasota

Well-Known Member
First Name
Al
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Threads
1
Messages
397
Reaction score
314
Location
Rochester, MN
Vehicle(s)
2026 Ranger XLT, 2023 Escape PHEV
Huh? I dont see that being the case. Fuel isnt even that expensive now.
Correct. Even with the recent spikes in cost, gasoline is at historically low prices when adjusted for inflation. ICE vehicles will continue to be avaialable for many years. Likely decades.
 

ryanO

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Sep 20, 2025
Threads
17
Messages
406
Reaction score
353
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2025 RangerXLT
Occupation
Sales
Correct. Even with the recent spikes in cost, gasoline is at historically low prices when adjusted for inflation. ICE vehicles will continue to be avaialable for many years. Likely decades.
I see so many people bitching about the cost of gas. If a $1 a gallon increase is of any real hardship, probably shouldn't be spending money on anything but basic necessities.
 

Lion77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2025
Threads
34
Messages
999
Reaction score
1,467
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger Raptor
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
That and alternative sources are being developed to replace OPEC which is now fractured. The US only gets 6% of its crude from that region anyway. One the biggest reserves is actually in Venezuela, right in our own back yard so to speak. Plus WE are producing more oil than any other nation at the moment (light crude). Over time it will go back down as new sources come online. UAE itself is already developing alternative transport routes.

I just drive my Mazda 3 a little more right now since it only needs 87 and gets 35-40 mpg and save the truck for things I WANT to do.
Sponsored

 
 







Top