Sponsored

Administrator

Administrator
Joined
Feb 14, 2017
Threads
163
Messages
393
Reaction score
784
Here's How Long We Torture Test Our Trucks Before We Hand You the Keys

by Ford (Sharyn Ghacham, communications manager for quality and safety at Ford Motor Company)

May 29, 2026

“I don’t think people understand what we put our vehicles through,” said Susan Regalia, who leads durability testing for some of Ford’s most iconic trucks as operations supervisor at Michigan Proving Grounds (MPG) in Romeo, Michigan.

“Most people in the general public would be really surprised to see everything we do to test them.”

Built Ford Tough is a well-known tagline, in use since 1979. But it’s not just catchy advertising.

It’s an inspiration for the teams running Ford’s durability testing: a marathon of severe trials designed to condense the wear and tear of ten years or 150,000 miles into just four months.

Ford Ranger Ford: Here's How Long We Torture Test Our Trucks Before We Hand You the Keys {filename}



“You’re taking out all the easy stuff,” Regalia said. “We are trying to use these vehicles as our most demanding customers would.”

During those four months, a test vehicle is in almost constant use.

Dyno tests measure engine performance by power, torque, and RPMs. Road surfaces are riddled with potholes and rumble strips. Trucks take on challenges from stair steps to rock crawls to water pits.

Previous generations of field testers used to take vehicles out west and drive them down actual creek beds, and MPG has built its own version in Silver Creek. It offers the same challenges — with a bit more predictability than a living stream — for more consistent test results.

And on Power Hop Hill, vehicles grind up an incline loaded with severe bumps all the way up.

Ford Ranger Ford: Here's How Long We Torture Test Our Trucks Before We Hand You the Keys {filename}



Vehicles aren’t just tested on multiple surfaces. They do it under extreme loads, tested at curb weight (what you'd expect with just a driver and passenger) and at gross vehicle weight.

They are also tested at top safe load, which can be placed in the rear or the front of the truck to simulate activities like snow plowing.

Drivers run the vehicles 24 hours a day, through vibration and shocks, the clanking of weights chained to the vehicles, and the noise of the road.

Along the way, they observe everything from the feel of the steering wheel to unusual noises to the way the vehicle handles.

Ford Ranger Ford: Here's How Long We Torture Test Our Trucks Before We Hand You the Keys {filename}



"We are trying to use these vehicles as our most demanding customers would.” - Susan Regalia, operations supervisor at MPG
All this can be demanding for humans to drive repeatedly, so robots have now been recruited to run some of the toughest surfaces. And the robots have recently graduated to the racetrack: 20 of them at a time can sometimes be seen driving paths around the high speed track.

Robots bring precision to the test track. Unlike humans, they can run the same test at exactly the same speed, time after time.

But humans introduce the variability of real life into the tests, and each test driver brings a different valuable perspective to the mix. That's why the testing process includes a blend of robotic consistency and human perception.

Throughout Ford’s durability testing, data loggers in the vehicle send information back to operators on everything from shock temperatures to wheel speeds.

“Whenever a new issue comes up, we celebrate it, because it means that we found the issue before a customer did," said Andrew Kernahan, vehicle programs director for heavy duty truck and platforms.

"Then we work the issue through a set of rigorous and standardized problem-solving techniques to identify root causes, take robust corrective actions, and implement them as quickly as possible.”

“There really is no substitute for putting a vehicle through its paces.” - Andrew Kernahan, vehicle programs director for heavy duty truck and platforms
Teams also stay in touch with customer-facing teams, gathering data to constantly update standards so current durability testing reflects the way customers are actually using their vehicles.

And the process isn’t one-and-done. Built Ford Tough vehicles undergo durability testing not just at the prototype stage, but also as production begins, when improvements to the design based on earlier durability testing are validated.

“There really is no substitute for putting a vehicle through its paces,” Kernahan said. “Real-world testing designed to validate Ford truck quality for our customers.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

fordtrks4ever

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jun 18, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
820
Reaction score
703
Location
Perkiomenville, Pa
Vehicle(s)
2025 Honda Odyssey, 2025 Ranger Raptor
Occupation
Retired
That is an interesting read. However I would ask, if the testing is a harsh and complete as claimed, why are the recall items discovered well after production has commenced? This all raises questions about the testing and if it's as complete as claimed?
I wonder is it could be the test vehicles are hand assembled and all the issues happen on the assembly line?
 

Jason B

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jason
Joined
Apr 27, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
1,185
Reaction score
1,264
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger XLT FX4
Occupation
machinist
That is an interesting read. However I would ask, if the testing is a harsh and complete as claimed, why are the recall items discovered well after production has commenced? This all raises questions about the testing and if it's as complete as claimed?
Because it's just one or two selected for testing. That kind of testing won't show S/W issues down the line, or NTSB recalls for something that might happen.
 

CACTUSGREYFX4

Well-Known Member
First Name
Pat
Joined
Jun 13, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
1,471
Location
ON, Canada
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4
Occupation
Fire Dept Dispatcher
They use to bring them to Canada in the winter when it's -35C out but not anymore.
 

Sponsored

pezdyspensr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
68
Reaction score
46
Location
New England
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger STX
I really do appreciate this testing and believe it provides significant value. There is one variable missing for me in these kinds of tests - thermal cycles. When you compress wear and tear into a short time frame, these vehicles never really go through anything close to the typical number of thermal cycles that consumer-owned vehicles do.
There is a pretty cool test somewhere on YT that Valvoline did with a pair of Explorers that had the outgoing 2.3 eco that ran them both to 500,000 miles to compare synthetic vs. conventional oil. Incredibly valuable insights gained, but once again, running vehicles very hot with very few thermal cycles and cold starts must contribute to that high mileage and perceived reliability.
All that said, I love that Ford does this and takes the time to advertise it.
 

Cliff3

Member
First Name
Cliff
Joined
Mar 1, 2026
Threads
1
Messages
7
Reaction score
22
Location
Eugene, OR
Vehicle(s)
26 Ranger Lariat 2.7L, 15 Porsche Cayman GTS
Occupation
Retired IT Consultant
Last Wednesday, the third day after I took delivery of my truck, the powertrain warning and malfunction indicator lights lit up and put my truck into limp mode. The dealer tells me that the codes thrown indicated an issue with the transmission solenoid. They checked connections and didn't see anything that needed fixing. They cleared the codes and they are going to beat on the truck today to see if the fault returns. It spent this last weekend at the dealer.

From my perspective, Ford has a ways to go with their testing.
 

Ron Quixote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2025
Threads
17
Messages
578
Reaction score
1,229
Location
America
Vehicle(s)
Several
I wonder is it could be the test vehicles are hand assembled and all the issues happen on the assembly line?
Indeed. I can believe that these trucks are specced to be bulletproof. But Ford apparently sucks at actually assembling customer vehicles. Maybe focus on that for a while?
 

saf1

Active Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2026
Threads
3
Messages
31
Reaction score
22
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2007 Toyota Sequoia
It would take a herculean effort to log a hundred thousand miles or so across the various roads and settings the truck was designed for or supports. Testing, triage, more testing, production design, more testing, rinse, repeat.

Pretty sure that is why they entered the pre-production raptors in the Baja races. Do what you can but it still may not be enough.
 

Sponsored

BC_Blue

Active Member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jun 14, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
37
Reaction score
55
Location
British Columbia, Canada
Vehicle(s)
2024 XLT FX4
I'd imagine post-torture they aren't stripping trim pieces off and checking every wire for rub/pinch points.. maybe an engine tear down at 500k gives them good data.

Without knowing what goes into all the recalls, hard to say if it would be found in testing anyways. Maybe the 3rd party block heater maker had a bad batch and notified FoMoCo before any actual failures (and maybe cover costs to keep their contract). Seat bolt torque should be held to an ASTM or ISO standard - say 2% calibration accuracy every 12 months and maybe they overran it by a month - probably fine but "technically" non-compliant. This new cam follower on the 2.3 is a big one though
 

skytrucker

Well-Known Member
First Name
Andy
Joined
Dec 14, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
53
Reaction score
85
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger Lariat
Yeah, testing is obviously important, and appreciated…
After just putting on a 1000mile highway trip, did they never test the “Pre-collision alert system” and associated sensors in a light rain? Or after catching a load of bugs the width of Iowa and Nebraska?
I was getting really used to setting the Adaptive cruise follow a few car lengths behind and letting someone “drag” me along I-80, until it gave up…. Maybe I’m the only one using their Ranger in such edge case scenarios….🤷‍♂️
 

Ron Quixote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2025
Threads
17
Messages
578
Reaction score
1,229
Location
America
Vehicle(s)
Several
Why didn’t torture testing catch this?

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a71483108/ford-bronco-sport-maverick-do-not-drive-warning/

Ford's latest recall involves two of its most popular models, the Bronco Sport and Maverick, which will need to be parked until they're inspected by an authorized dealer. So, what's the problem? Well, certain models may have front suspensions that could fall apart and possibly cause an accident. As a result, Ford has issued a "Do Not Drive" warning that affects 4653 total vehicles.
 

Jason B

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jason
Joined
Apr 27, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
1,185
Reaction score
1,264
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
2024 Ranger XLT FX4
Occupation
machinist
Why didn’t torture testing catch this?

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a71483108/ford-bronco-sport-maverick-do-not-drive-warning/

Ford's latest recall involves two of its most popular models, the Bronco Sport and Maverick, which will need to be parked until they're inspected by an authorized dealer. So, what's the problem? Well, certain models may have front suspensions that could fall apart and possibly cause an accident. As a result, Ford has issued a "Do Not Drive" warning that affects 4653 total vehicles.
Because the ones they tested, didn't have that problem. They are not testing every vehicle that comes off the line.
 
 







Top