• Welcome to Ranger6G.com everyone!

    If you're joining us from Ranger5G, then you may already have an account here! As long as you were registered on Ranger5G as of March 27, 2020 or earlier, then you can simply login here with the same username and password.

Sponsored

gdub

Member
First Name
Gary
Joined
Jun 22, 2023
Threads
2
Messages
23
Reaction score
13
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
2002 Ranger FX4
Occupation
Aerospace Engineer.
I have not seen a post on this yet. The mileage for the 2024 2.3L Ecoboost is pretty much the same as 2023. One exception is the highway mileage has dropped 1 mpg but the combined is still the same.

What really got my attention is they listed the 2.7L Ecoboost mileage. That helps to confirm we may eventually see that V6 in the Ranger. The mileage for the 2.7L engine compared to the 2.3L drops 1 mpg for both the city and highway mileage, but the combined somehow dropped by 2 mpg. (?) Maybe I read it wrong.

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2024_Ford_Ranger.shtml

Ford Ranger 2.7L EcoBoost V6 EPA MPG Gas Mileage Released for 2024 Ranger 2024-ranger-mpg-epa-mileage-fuel-economy



Fuel Economy Type2024 Ford Ranger2023 Ford Ranger
2.3L EcoBoost I-4 RWD
City MPG2121
Highway MPG2526
Combined MPG2223
2.3L EcoBoost I-4 4WD
City MPG2020
Highway MPG2424
Combined MPG2222
2.7L EcoBoost V6 4WD
City MPG19
Highway MPG23
Combined MPG20
3.0L EcoBoost V6 4WD (Raptor)
City MPG16
Highway MPG18
Combined MPG17
Sponsored

 

jdlapointe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
209
Reaction score
195
Location
Maine
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ford Taurus, 1970 Fairlane 500
Occupation
Project Manager
It was posted a long time ago, but not the 2.7l mpg. They round the MPG numbers, so I imagine the combined is a reflection of the average rounding down and not up. The highway MPG is probably closer to 22.5
 

Trustyf

New Member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
4
Reaction score
5
Location
Jonesboro,ar
Vehicle(s)
2021 ford f150 supercritical stx
Occupation
Optician
I have not seen a post on this yet. The mileage for the 2024 2.3L Ecoboost is pretty much the same as 2023. One exception is the highway mileage has dropped 1 mpg but the combined is still the same.

What really got my attention is they listed the 2.7L Ecoboost mileage. That helps to confirm we may eventually see that V6 in the Ranger. The mileage for the 2.7L engine compared to the 2.3L drops 1 mpg for both the city and highway mileage, but the combined somehow dropped by 2 mpg. (?) Maybe I read it wrong.


Fuel Economy Type2024 Ford Ranger2023 Ford Ranger
2.3L EcoBoost I-4 RWD
City MPG2121
Highway MPG2526
Combined MPG2223
2.3L EcoBoost I-4 4WD
City MPG2020
Highway MPG2424
Combined MPG2222
2.7L EcoBoost V6 4WD
City MPG19
Highway MPG23
Combined MPG20
3.0L EcoBoost V6 4WD (Raptor)
City MPG16
Highway MPG18
Combined MPG17
Also 4wd only. Wonder which trims it will be available in?
 
OP
OP

gdub

Member
First Name
Gary
Joined
Jun 22, 2023
Threads
2
Messages
23
Reaction score
13
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
2002 Ranger FX4
Occupation
Aerospace Engineer.
Thanks to whoever cleaned up the title to make it more current and added the charts for my post. :thumbsup:
 

jdlapointe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
209
Reaction score
195
Location
Maine
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ford Taurus, 1970 Fairlane 500
Occupation
Project Manager
This helps confirm that the 2.7l is limited to the 4x4 only. Previous literature alluded to this as well.
 

Sponsored

PawnX

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
79
Reaction score
44
Location
PNW
Vehicle(s)
Ranger
This helps confirm that the 2.7l is limited to the 4x4 only. Previous literature alluded to this as well.
Yeah when they announced it i was wondering it would be standard in the tremor trim which is what I wanted, but still yet to be released.
 

HighDesertRanger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jul 2, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
136
Reaction score
97
Location
New Mexico
Vehicle(s)
Ford Fusion Sport
Occupation
Sales Manager
Here’s hoping the Tremor becomes a thing. Kind of like the Wildtrak in Australia.
 

Geotoxic

Active Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
32
Reaction score
24
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
Tacoma TRD Pro
I thought 2.7L was already confirmed for ranger? It's on their website.

Ford Ranger 2.7L EcoBoost V6 EPA MPG Gas Mileage Released for 2024 Ranger Screenshot_20240316_005015_Chrome
 

Chassis N2531

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Feb 22, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
53
Reaction score
70
Location
TX
Vehicle(s)
2022 GT500
I consider it a strategic fail to the masses that the 2.7 isn't available now.
 

Sponsored

richman555

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
Mar 11, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
74
Reaction score
57
Location
Collegeville, PA
Vehicle(s)
2018 Honda CRV
Occupation
Software Engineer
I consider it a strategic fail to the masses that the 2.7 isn't available now.
They could have gotten the jump on Toyota by offering the 2.7 earlier. Toyota will at some point release their hybrid engine to compete with it.
 

FreezingFlatlander

Active Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
44
Reaction score
30
Location
Montana
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ford F150 4x4 3.5 Ecoboost
Occupation
Retired
Have never driven a vehicle with the 2.3 so can't compare but had an F150 4x4 with the 2.7 and had no complaints with either the level of power nor the gas mileage. I liked the 2.7 engine. The 2.7 F150 averaged around 20 mpg for me and would run 22 mpg driving on a longer highway trip while driving 70 mph. I would prefer the 2.7 but am not waiting another year to get one, haven't gotten the 2.3 yet.
 

fordtrks4ever

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jun 18, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
391
Reaction score
264
Location
Perkiomenville, Pa
Vehicle(s)
2021 Honda Odyssey
Occupation
Retired
Have never driven a vehicle with the 2.3 so can't compare but had an F150 4x4 with the 2.7 and had no complaints with either the level of power nor the gas mileage. I liked the 2.7 engine. The 2.7 F150 averaged around 20 mpg for me and would run 22 mpg driving on a longer highway trip while driving 70 mph. I would prefer the 2.7 but am not waiting another year to get one, haven't gotten the 2.3 yet.
I have driven a 2.3 turbo in an 1986 Tunderbird turbo coupe.
I called it my Pinto on steroids. It was fast with the 5 speed manual. New ones are a lot better I would think.
Also wanted the 2.7 but did not want to wait another year.
 

chasvs

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
884
Reaction score
145
Location
Tampa
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat
This helps confirm that the 2.7l is limited to the 4x4 only. Previous literature alluded to this as well.
There'd be nearly constant wheel spin on sharp turns and rainy street with the 2.7 on a 4x2. Tough enough on my 2019 Ranger lariat 4x2 with the 2.3 4! Gonna want to be in 4 Auto all the time with that 2.7!
 

chasvs

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
884
Reaction score
145
Location
Tampa
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ranger Lariat
I thought 2.7L was already confirmed for ranger? It's on their website.

Screenshot_20240316_005015_Chrome.jpg
Doesn't show up in the BUild Your Ranger configurator yet. Understand it's a Job 2 item. Maybe this summer. Hoping Order Books open for it soon. Know what i want and can't wait to throw my Money down!
 
 




Top