Ron Quixote
Well-Known Member
I kinda feel like this argument has run its course.
Sponsored
Sorry, I'm just a dummy, so I need you to explain what the 2.7L does that the 2.3L doesn't.Even if you didnt find it more fun and consider it a tool, you would think you would opt for the more capable engine no?
We're all having an intelligent conversation.I kinda feel like this argument has run its course.
We're all having an intelligent conversation.
I am sure you're correct.@daytoncarter I've towed many miles with both. 2.3L in a 2022 Ranger and a 2.7L in a 2024. The 2.7 is hands down better at towing. For the record I'm towing a 1940 Ford on an 18 Ft car trailer as well as a 19' camper.
When you get into any hills, the 2.7 is much better at both pulling and engine braking.
No crap. Level reinforced. Nothing is pure kevlar except kevlar. But that design is not associated with known issues thus far. It's not the same old wet belt was my point.it's not pure kevlar ,,, LOL
Please cite your proof that this is a "cheap" and "fail on purpose" design. I'm assuming you're an engineer and have researched this beyond what someone said on youtubezzzzWhat do you guys think of this cheap wet belt and issues in the future? Until 2017 the 3.0 ecoboost oil pump was chain driven. .
This is a big engineering downgrade, and don’t come with things like less friction an emissions, because this is a fail on purpose design. .
It's a big job. Need to remove the whole front end of the truck to even start. Part of the reason people are upset at the choice. If it was a simple job I'm sure there would be less upset.Is there no way to replace the belt if you're one of the few who actually wants to go past 10 years/200k? I mean what are we talking here.
I don’t understand what some of the guys are trying to achive. . Saying that a rubber belt is the same resistance or durability of steel alloys, denotes a miss of basic common sense understanding, not even needing to point materials engineering.Please cite your proof that this is a "cheap" and "fail on purpose" design. I'm assuming you're an engineer and have researched this beyond what someone said on youtubezzzz
So you have nothing. Got it. Opinions are nice, but data is important in a discussion about engineering.I don’t understand what some of the guys are trying to achive. . Saying that a rubber belt is the same resistance or durability of steel alloys, denotes a miss of basic common sense understanding, not even needing to point materials engineering.
When people start to compare steel with rubber or kevlar fibers. . I imagine that the same people will also say that polymer (plastic,rubber) will also be perfect to build exhaust manifolds, engine exhaust valves, etc.
Yes, i have nothing to people that calls to a hammer, a door.So you have nothing. Got it. Opinions are nice, but data is important in a discussion about engineering.