a77cj7
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Chris
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2023
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 258
- Location
- Sturgis, SD
- Vehicle(s)
- 98 Ranger
There’s nothing “wrong” with the factory intercooler, just as there is nothing “wrong” with the factory tune. But some of us want more.Right, so I need to replace mine with an aftermarket because if I don't, it will spontaneously combust or something? I do get what you're saying, but I don't think there's an epidemic of OEM Ford Ecoboost IC failures, or we'd know about it.
But unless you're willing to relocate the entire unit, isn't any IC constrained by the space available in the vehicle? How do aftermarket ICs solve this problem? Also, wouldn't the "flimsy" tube/fins of the OEM unit actually help it exchange heat faster?
I just can't yet understand how upgrading the OEM IC without also modifying other parts of the engine (i.e. bigger turbos) that can take advantage of the benefits is money well spent.
These modern turbo motors have generally proven to be quite receptive to significant power increases from tuning, but there are bottlenecks that can be improved.
Ford ecoboost motors have been consistently shown to have suboptimal intercooler performance. From the graph posted by wagner, the ranger raptor is no exception.
I am not trying to “go crazy” with modifying my low-mile daily driver vehicles, thats saved for the project cars. But I do like to improve performance, and go after any “ cheap, easy” mods that can increase it significantly.
For my b58 bimmer, thats a jb4 and a catted downpipe. The factory intercooler is just fine there.
For my Ranger Raptor, thats a ford performance tune and an intercooler upgrade.
I will continue to watch testing results to see if more low hanging fruit is uncovered.
Sponsored